A Senator Finally Said the 'B' Word
Senator Wyden confirms what I've reported for six years: Epstein ran a blackmail scheme. So why is the New York Times burying it?
Six weeks after Jeffrey Epstein died in his Manhattan jail cell, I published an interview I had recorded days after his death. My investigation had multiple sources confirming that Epstein operated as an intelligence asset running a blackmail operation targeting America’s elite. I documented the financial crimes, the intelligence connections, the systematic compromise of democratic institutions.
But that’s not where the story ends.
That was just the beginning. What followed was a six year immersion course into how the media world really works. I took the story to CNN who immediately bought it - only to kill it. Catch and kill - the same technique the National Enquirer used to protect Trump, now deployed by a major news network to bury the Epstein blackmail operation.
My former colleagues at CBS News were happy to see me - only to pour cold water over the story - even though I knew it met their standards and practices. The network where I’d worked as an executive producer went against their own journalistic standards to protect Epstein.
So there I was: a reporter stuck in the worst position you ever wanted to be in: holding the hottest story in the world without the protection or backing of a major news organization. I understood the calculation perfectly. If I didn’t report what I knew, I’d have a target on my back. If I did report it, I’d also have a target on my back - but maybe less so.
So I did the only thing I could do - I reported it anyway on my podcast.
I was sure of my sources. I was sure of my training. I knew what I had.
What followed wasn’t debate about the facts - it was like a hurricane ripped through my life.
Six Years Later, They’re Still Burying It
Now the New York Times publishes 7,000 words about Epstein’s financial control over Leon Black. They have the emails. They have the Senate investigation. They have a sitting U.S. Senator using the word blackmail to describe the relationship.
And they bury it at the end of the article as a response to their piece from Senator Wyden whose office likely provided the trove of emails to the Times.
“This report raises questions as to whether there was more at play in the relationship between these two men, potentially including blackmail,” Senator Ron Wyden said.
That’s how the Times avoided reaching the obvious conclusion. A United States Senator investigating billions in Epstein transactions publicly states this was blackmail. That’s not buried in paragraph 87. That’s the headline.
Instead, the Times frames the story around nasty emails and financial disputes—Epstein’s tantrums, his demands for $40 million annually. They give you smoke while obscuring fire. Again.
Six years after CNN killed my story, institutional media is still playing the same game. They’re obscuring the truth while ensuring you miss it.
Here’s what the Times minimized: Bank of America flagged $170 million of Black’s payments to Epstein as suspicious. Black wired hundreds of thousands to at least three women listed as Epstein’s associates and victims in federal filings. Two more women told Virgin Islands investigators that Black sexually abused them after Epstein introduced them. Black paid $62.5 million to the Virgin Islands for immunity—a settlement explicitly stating “Jeffrey Epstein used the money Black paid him to partially fund his operations.”
That’s a blackmail operation with a paper trail.
Trump’s Commerce Secretary Confirms It
Three weeks ago, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick—Epstein’s former neighbor—called him “the greatest blackmailer ever,” directly contradicting the FBI and DOJ’s official position.
Lutnick described visiting Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse and seeing a massage table surrounded by candles as the centerpiece. When he asked about it, Epstein moved uncomfortably close: “the right kind of massage” daily.
“What happened in that massage room, I assume, was on video,” Lutnick said. “This guy was the greatest blackmailer ever, blackmailed people. That’s how he had money.”
His comments enraged Trump officials who spent months claiming Epstein didn’t blackmail anyone. FBI Director Kash Patel testified under oath there’s “no credible evidence.” Now Patel’s senior—a Cabinet secretary—publicly calls that a lie. Rep. Robert Garcia demanded Lutnick testify. Lutnick declined.
Paid subscribers can access a deeper dive below
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Narativ with Zev Shalev to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.