Please remember that most Americans do not support drump’s actions to take over Greenland.
Having said that, NATO countries must resist, push back and stop drump and his regime from this hostile takeover of Greenland, and other South American countries.
Okay, if you want to be precise, reminding us of what Carter said helps keep the general knowledge of the issue at the front of people's minds.
I think that's helpful, although of course, what you Americans I think call "receipts" are required for effective legal action. You were meaning hard evidence, verified facts, weren't you?
My point was that Anita Moses' comment was worthwhile, and I wouldn't want her to be put off from further contributions.
It puzzles me to hear the Danish leader say an invasion of Greenland would end NATO. It seems like exactly the wrong response. It seems like an invasion of Greenland should be expected to unite NATO in the way a third party threat unites any group, with the US being informally or formally expelled or (please) ignored... shunned. Why on earth should NATO shatter the first time it is called upon to act upon promises made, just because a formerly important anchor state violates those promises? All other members of NATO should stand up and state firmly and very publicly that they will meet their obligations to Denmark should any portion of the kingdom be invaded regardless of the source of the threat. I can just hear Putin perk up his ears when he hears an invasion of Greenland will end NATO.
"Olga pointed out Europe has triple America’s population and comparable wealth. “All planning needs to be without the United States,” she said. They need a democracy force including Canada, Japan, and South Korea, because NATO can’t defend against the country threatening them."
Q1, Zev and Olga, I need more clarity here, please. Canada is opening a consulate in Greenland. France ditto. The analysis on Dean's substack last week, I think, was that if the US attacked, it would be dealing with Canada and France as well as the Greenlanders and Denmark. Does that hold up?
Another political-military defensive approach proposed on another substack was for the very up-to-date navies of the Northern European countries + Canada (all equipped for North Atlantic + Arctic conditions) to conduct rotating patrols of the 2 "gaps": one between a) Iceland and Greenland and the 2nd between b) Iceland and Ireland. Monitoring, missile-firing capacity, etc. Many if not all would be NATO members. A retired Brigadier General who reviewed the approach thought it very doable. Q2 What do you think?
There was a 4 page article I put out on Ellie's Substack a day ago, I think. it talked about Zorro Ranch & how sex trafficking occurred there as well which the NM AG was investigating. it's interesting because Zorro Trust won a lottery. This was all over the old Twitter. It may have been cited in the Mueller report. OSINT people had threads on it. I'll have to try to find article or perhaps Ellie can bring it up. it was a DETAILED 4 part article.
Welcome. I was wrong about the Zorro Trust. It turns out from the article a woman won the lottery & just happened to have a trust named Zorro like Epstein did.
I would have liked to see Olga's prior work cited so others could look it up easily. I know about her posts since I have been following her for some time, but there are always new people who would benefit. Just a thought...
Please remember that most Americans do not support drump’s actions to take over Greenland.
Having said that, NATO countries must resist, push back and stop drump and his regime from this hostile takeover of Greenland, and other South American countries.
Jimmy Carter stated in an interview a year before his passing, that Donald Trump was an illegitimate president in 2016.
And, how does that exactly help us now?
It adds to the evidence at hand.
Not really. It’s his opinion, and I agree either way it, but in a court of law, not so much.
Okay, if you want to be precise, reminding us of what Carter said helps keep the general knowledge of the issue at the front of people's minds.
I think that's helpful, although of course, what you Americans I think call "receipts" are required for effective legal action. You were meaning hard evidence, verified facts, weren't you?
My point was that Anita Moses' comment was worthwhile, and I wouldn't want her to be put off from further contributions.
It puzzles me to hear the Danish leader say an invasion of Greenland would end NATO. It seems like exactly the wrong response. It seems like an invasion of Greenland should be expected to unite NATO in the way a third party threat unites any group, with the US being informally or formally expelled or (please) ignored... shunned. Why on earth should NATO shatter the first time it is called upon to act upon promises made, just because a formerly important anchor state violates those promises? All other members of NATO should stand up and state firmly and very publicly that they will meet their obligations to Denmark should any portion of the kingdom be invaded regardless of the source of the threat. I can just hear Putin perk up his ears when he hears an invasion of Greenland will end NATO.
"Olga pointed out Europe has triple America’s population and comparable wealth. “All planning needs to be without the United States,” she said. They need a democracy force including Canada, Japan, and South Korea, because NATO can’t defend against the country threatening them."
Q1, Zev and Olga, I need more clarity here, please. Canada is opening a consulate in Greenland. France ditto. The analysis on Dean's substack last week, I think, was that if the US attacked, it would be dealing with Canada and France as well as the Greenlanders and Denmark. Does that hold up?
Another political-military defensive approach proposed on another substack was for the very up-to-date navies of the Northern European countries + Canada (all equipped for North Atlantic + Arctic conditions) to conduct rotating patrols of the 2 "gaps": one between a) Iceland and Greenland and the 2nd between b) Iceland and Ireland. Monitoring, missile-firing capacity, etc. Many if not all would be NATO members. A retired Brigadier General who reviewed the approach thought it very doable. Q2 What do you think?
There was a 4 page article I put out on Ellie's Substack a day ago, I think. it talked about Zorro Ranch & how sex trafficking occurred there as well which the NM AG was investigating. it's interesting because Zorro Trust won a lottery. This was all over the old Twitter. It may have been cited in the Mueller report. OSINT people had threads on it. I'll have to try to find article or perhaps Ellie can bring it up. it was a DETAILED 4 part article.
I just read it. Very helpful. Thanks.
Welcome. I was wrong about the Zorro Trust. It turns out from the article a woman won the lottery & just happened to have a trust named Zorro like Epstein did.
Didn't she live over the road? Or have some apparent connection?
There's no "just happened" in their world. I think you were most probably right.
🤔That's probably right. I have a friend on X who says there are no coincidences. There are only unprosecuted felonies.😎
Ukraines cannot depend on American support because drump is only working with Putin.
Although Putin sees drump as a useful puppet.
What’s in those Epstein files?
Americans need to learn which Epstein buddies are being protected.
https://www.fa-mag.com/news/more-questions-about-how-jeffrey-epstein-got-island-owning-rich-50632.html
THE ABOVE LINK IS THE ARTICLE REGARDING EPSTEIN & ZORRO RANCH & OTHER MATTERS!
Very helpful. Thanks.
Great investigative reporting👏🏻👏🏻
Such an informative conversation!
Awesome all👏🏻🥰🥰💙🇺🇸The Victims need Justice & Closeure😢
I would have liked to see Olga's prior work cited so others could look it up easily. I know about her posts since I have been following her for some time, but there are always new people who would benefit. Just a thought...
Sorry I can't get the link correct. ☹️It's on Ellie's New Year Substack.
Your link did work. I just read the whole thing through. Thankyou.